Infant Taken From Parents After They Refuse "Vaccinated" Blood Transfusion
A family in New Zealand has uninjected blood donors lined up to donate blood to their infant needing a blood transfusion. Doctors are refusing to accommodate the request and the state has stepped in.
Article by Scott Armstrong
Video Clip from The Daily Wrap-Up with Ryan Cristián: Large Peer Reviewed Study Finds COVID Booster Mandates Cause “Net Harm” & Nasal Flu Jabs Cause Strep (12/7/2022)
For More, please visit TheLastAmericanVagabond.com
Save Baby Will
This is a tragic case. In New Zealand, a six-month old with a congenital heart defect needed emergency surgery. In this case, the infant needed to have a blood transfusion as part of the surgery. The parents stated that they did not want their child to receive blood from anybody who had taken the Covid injection. They even took it upon themselves to find multiple uninjected blood donors who were willing to donate their blood for the operation. The hospital refused to accommodate this request, stating that there is no difference between injected and uninjected blood.
The New Zealand government decided to intervene on the case and took custody of the child from the parents, insisting that the surgery will take place without consideration as to where the blood for the transfusion comes from. This case has been covered on multiple major media outlets, and most of the details of the case can be found on James Roguski’s Substack Page with the following posts. We want to encourage you to go and watch all of the videos here and check out all of the source material:
When this story broke several days ago, it created an international uproar. Since then, the parents have gone on several large platforms to tell their story (see links above) and have rallied to raise money for their legal defense. You can donate to the cause by visiting HelpBabyWill.com or clicking here.
The Last American Vagabond Substack is a value-for-value experience. Please consider upgrading your subscription today to help TLAV grow.
After the court determined that Baby Will would be placed under guardianship of the child’s surgeon, the family decided not to appeal this decision. According to Baby Will’s lawyer,Sue Grey, Baby Will underwent the surgery and is doing well as of 12/9/2022.
I called and spoke with James Roguski this evening, who has been covering case. He stated that this information is correct. Baby Will did undergo surgery and he is doing fine with no complications. James said there was some indication that perhaps the hospital might have tried to utilize uninjected blood, but there is no way that anyone can be certain.
Here is footage of the parents leaving the hospital with Baby Will post surgery and providing comments, alluding to the fact that perhaps the hospital might have tried to accommodate their request behind the scenes:
Injected vs. Uninjected Blood
Here is a deep-dive episode that Ryan did into the evidence supporting that mRNA can transfer between the injected and the uninjected via breastmilk, saliva and other similar mediums of transer.
We will start off by pointing out that official sources, such as the American Red Cross, seem to be unaware of the current science that suggests that mRNA spike protein can be found in people’s blood following injection, along with every other organ in the body.
A report came out recently from a “Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis” out of Germany published on June 7, 2022. The report states “This summary is a preliminary, continuously evolving presentation of our research and findings on the so-called COVID-19 vaccines, as well as the effects we found on the human body and the blood in particular. The summary is intended for the public interest and to encourage further scientific discussion.”
An excerpt from this report reads as follows:
We have established that the COVID-19 vaccines consistently contain, in addition to contaminants, substances the purpose of which we are unable to determine. Some of these ingredients uncovered by us have not even been listed as ingredients by the Vaccine manufacturers. Using a small sample of live blood analyses from both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, we have determined that artificial intelligence (AI) can distinguish with 100% reliability between the blood of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. a small sample of live blood analyses from both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, we have determined that artificial intelligence (AI) can distinguish with 100% reliability between the blood of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This indicates that the COVID-19 vaccines can effect long-term changes in the composition of the blood of the person vaccinated without that person being aware of these changes.
So we have determined that computer systems, which they call “artificial intelligence”, is able to differentiate between injected and uninjected blood 100% of the time without fail. This leads us to believe that there is a distinction between the two. Vaccinated blood is different from unvaccinated blood.
Here is an image from the report:
From the report in reference to this image above: “Figure 2: The two images show anomalous objects in the blood of a 52-year-old male subject vaccinated with Comirnaty. The subject complained of severe fatigue and exhaustion. The picture on the left shows a similar object in unadulterated Comirnaty from BioNTech/Pfizer (from different batches). These kinds of objects are by no means unique and have been observed repeatedly by numerous independent observers in different blood samples and in samples of vaccines, so it is extremely improbable that they are the consequence of subsequent contamination. Needless to say, because of their size, such large objects can lead to disruptions in the blood circulation in the vessels.”
From the report: Figure 4: These 4 images illustrate the variety of unusual phenomena and objects found in the blood of subjects vaccinated with Comirnaty (BioNTech/Pfizer).
There are many more photos in the report and a lot more evidence to suggest that something is horribly amiss. At the very least, it is absolutely imperative that people should have the capability of decline receiving blood that could be potentially contaminated with these unknown foreign objects, especially if a viable and readily available alternative is present.
Once again, this is an attack on informed consent and a complete violation of basic human rights. It becomes even more viscous when it involves the health of an infant. I can’t imagine being placed in a more dire situation. The absolute audacity of these officers of the court and hospital staff to turn this situation into an international incident over their misguided principles is astounding. Once again we saw the appalling attacks by the mainstream media, smearing the family and everyone involved in the outcry as well.
Our prayers go out to the family, and to Baby Will’s speedy recovery. We hope that this dangerous precedent goes no further and that no other family’s lives will be tormented in such a way. Help spread this information far and wide to counteract the vitriol of the mainstream. This is an easy win for the truth and will most certainly help others who are waking up to better understand the true nature of those in charge of public health policy worldwide.
Note to the Readers:
Thank you for your ongoing support of The Last American Vagabond. TLAV is a Value-For-Value experience. We want to invite you to subscribe to our Substack for as little as $5/month to join the discussion, comment on posts, join the TLAV Roundtable Discussions and feel good about supporting alternative media that you value. Upgrade to the Founding Member Level for the opportunity to have a monthly Q&A with Ryan as well. Thank you to all of you who already support TLAV in all the various ways that you do with your time, talent and treasure.
Infant Taken From Parents After They Refuse "Vaccinated" Blood Transfusion