Playback speed
undefinedx
Share post
Share post at current time
0:00
/
0:00
3

Pfizer Officials Exposed, Refuse To Answer Questions In Australian Senate Hearing

Australian Senator Malcom Roberts questions two representatives from Pfizer and is met with nothing but lies and sidesteps to his direct questions. Pfizer is clearly working hard to deceive the public
3

Article by Scott Armstrong | Rebunked News | @RebunkedNews

Clip from The Daily Wrap-up with Ryan Cristián: Pfizer Hearings Expose Blatant Pharma Dishonesty, Niger Revolution & East Palestine Just Got Worse (8/3/2023)

For more, please visit TheLastAmericanVagabond.com
Follow TLAV on Twitter: @TLAVagabond


Lies Of Omission

In a recent Australian Senate Hearing, two officials from Pfizer were brought forward to answer some very simple questions about what Pfizer knew prior to the COVID injection rollout.

Australia’s Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee convened and brought two Pfizer officials, including Pfizer Australia’s Country Medical Director, Dr. Krishan Thiru, in front of Queensland Senator Gerard Rennick to answer some questions about what Pfizer knew before rolling out the injections.

The Last American Vagabond Substack is a value-for-value experience. Please consider upgrading your Substack subscription today for as little as $5/month to help TLAV grow.

As you see in the video clip above, along with Ryan’s analysis, nothing is actually accomplished in the hearing as the Pfizer officials refuse to answer any of the questions.

They are repeatedly asked for sources, studies, or anything that could back up Pfizer’s claim that the injection would stop the “transmission” of COVID, only to be met with one answer after another, sidestepping the question in a very blatant fashion.

This all speaks to the lack of information that Pfizer had prior to going around telling media outlets that their product was “safe and effective.” By refusing to answer the questions, they are admitting that they did not know how the injection caused myocarditis, yet advocated for its safety anyway.

Share

This is completely in line with what we already know about Pfizer’s compromised clinical trial process, as reported by Whistleblower Brook Jackson. Watch Ryan’s most recent interview with Brook here.

Brook highlights two other important points that were brought up during questioning that the Pfizer officials refused to answer. 1) Does your contract with the government for the supply of COVID injections include a clause that negates your indemnity in the event of Pfizer committing a crime such as fraudulent treatment of trial data, and 2) Were the injections originally developed as a counter-measure for the US Department of Defense?

Brook says “Yes” to both of those questions, while the Pfizer representatives continuously evade:

Hearings like this are what we expect these days from any sort of private entity that is asked to answer for their misconduct. The public is met with continuous non-answers that serve to avoid the question. We see same thing play out in every similar hearing, such as the Social Media censorship hearings or the classic scripted lines given by Admiral Rachel Levine when grilled about his positions related to the mutilation of children in the name of “transgender medicine.”

The Last American Vagabond Substack is a value-for-value experience. Please consider upgrading your Substack subscription today for as little as $5/month to help support all of our contributors.

There should be measures in place to raise the level of accountability beyond just having to sit in front of a legislative body and avoid questions. Failure to answer questions should be met with criminal punishment. These companies should be fined out of existence. It leaves one wondering if it is just all a show, that maybe the government is in on it, that the only role they serve is to give the public the impression that they are doing something about it, when nothing ever gets done.

People like Sen. Rand Paul have made a name themselves throughout this saga by “asking hard questions,” but if no answers are derived and no changes are made, what is the point?

But that doesn’t mean that we stop asking the questions. It is up to US to ask the questions, seek the truth and stop looking to government bodies to do anything for us. Question everything.

Share


Note to the Readers:

Thank you for your ongoing support of The Last American Vagabond. TLAV is a Value-For-Value experience. We want to invite you to subscribe to our Substack for as little as $5/month to join the discussion, comment on posts, join the TLAV Roundtable Discussions and feel good about supporting alternative media that you value. Upgrade to the Founding Member Level for the opportunity to have a monthly Q&A with Ryan as well. Thank you to all of you who already support TLAV in all the various ways that you do with your time, talent and treasure.

Share

Share The Last American Vagabond Substack

Read The Last American Vagabond Substack in the Substack app
Available for iOS and Android

3 Comments
The Last American Vagabond Substack
The Last American Vagabond Substack
Authors
The Last American Vagabond