Article by Scott Armstrong
Clip from The Daily Wrap-Up with Ryan Cristián: Large Peer Reviewed Study Finds COVID Booster Mandates Cause “Net Harm” & Nasal Flu Jabs Cause Strep (12/7/2022)
For More, Please Visit TheLastAmericanVagabond.com
Vaccination Is A Major Risk Factor
A paper published in The Lancet from February 2022 determined that some people’s immune response to Covid-19 infection dropped below zero around 8 months following a two-dose regimen of various versions of the Covid-19 “vaccine”. These negative immune responses were primarily seen 120 days post-injection and in age groups over 50, most significantly in men, and people over 80 years old. This means that in some cases, the shots were actually causing more harm than good in certain individuals and suggests that their immune function was below that of an uninjected individual. Here are some of the tables from The Lancet study:
A paper published in PubMed this last June by Dr. Kenji Yamamoto, a cardiovascular surgeon located in Japan, analyzes this Lancet study and provides powerful context. From the paper by Dr. Yamamoto:
Recently, The Lancet published a study on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the waning of immunity with time. The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals. According to European Medicines Agency recommendations, frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible. The decrease in immunity can be caused by several factors such as N1-methylpseudouridine, the spike protein, lipid nanoparticles, antibody-dependent enhancement, and the original antigenic stimulus.
Dr. Yamamoto is stating that frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect people’s immune response? But that’s not possible! I thought the TV said that these shots were 100% safe and effective in every single situation without exception! Could the TV be lying to me? Dr. Yamamoto goes on to make a very bold claim:
“In conclusion, COVID-19 vaccination is a major risk factor for infections in critically ill patients.”
Dr. Kenji Yamamoto
Fact-checkers, the mainstream media and everyone who seeks to benefit from the injection-at-all-cost narrative quickly ran into action to dispel this claim. This is from a “fact-check” on a website called healthfeedback.org:
Misrepresents source: The Lancet study cited in the video examined how COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness wanes over time. The study didn’t examine immunity to infectious diseases in general nor did it find that COVID-19 vaccines weaken the immune system.
Misleading: The review article by Seneff et al. provided no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines weaken the immune system.
In typical form, the fact check creates a strawman argument saying that there is no proof that the shots reduce immune function against ALL illnesses, therefore false. The study does show, however (see charts above), that some people have a lower immune response than those who remained uninjected, which shows that the shots actually caused some people to be more susceptible to Covid-19 infection. Call it what you want. Apparently these fact checkers don’t want to call it a “weakened immune system”.
The Spike Protein is Neurotoxic
A separate study from Science Direct entitled Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs comes to some bold conclusions as well. Please take the time to look over theis study for yourself:
mRNA vaccines promote sustained synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
The spike protein is neurotoxic, and it impairs DNA repair mechanisms.
Suppression of type I interferon responses results in impaired innate immunity.
The mRNA vaccines potentially cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.
Codon optimization results in G-rich mRNA that has unpredictable complex effects.
Lymphocytopenia and Post-Injection Cancer Risk
A paper from Swiss Policy Research looking at the associations between the Covid-19 Injections and Cancer states:
…if there is a predisposition to some type of cancer, such a state of vaccine-induced immune suppression or immune dysregulation might potentially trigger sudden tumor growth and cancer in the weeks following vaccination.
One of these vectors of immunosuppression or dysregulation is known as Lymphocytopenia, which is defined as follows:
Lymphocytopenia happens when your body doesn’t have enough lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell that helps defend your body from viruses, cancer and other intruders. Lymphocytopenia is linked to many different diseases and conditions. Healthcare providers treat this condition by treating the underlying cause.
Even a paper detailing the outcome of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection (BNT162b1) Phase I and II study discusses the phenomenon of decreased lymphocyte count. From a study published on Nature entitled Phase I/II study of COVID-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults:
Of those with laboratory changes, the largest changes were decreases in the lymphocyte count after the first dose in 8.3% (1 out of 12), 45.5% (5 out of 11) and 50.0% (6 out of 12) of participants who received 10 μg, 30 μg and 100 μg BNT162b1, respectively. One participant each in the 10-μg (8.3% (1 out of 12)) and 30-μg (9.1% (1 out of 11)) groups and 4 participants in the 100-μg group (33.3% (4 out of 12)) had grade 3 decreases in the lymphocyte count. These decreases in lymphocyte count after the first dose were transient and returned to normal 6–8 days after vaccination
Multiple other studies also indicate that there are other negative health outcomes associated with lymphocytopenia and lowered lymphocyte count:
We hope that you take this information and share it with those in your life who you feel would benefit from it. The criteria for informed consent cannot be met if people are unaware of issues like a significant increased risk of cancer following the injection. Informed consent cannot be met if people don’t understand that their overall immune function drops below that of an individual who has not taken the shot after a certain period of time post injection, in a certain age group. If the establishment is unwilling to provide the proper level of informed consent, someone has to do it. We are proud to be forced into that position and we thank you for your help in getting this information out there.
Note to the Readers:
Thank you for your ongoing support of The Last American Vagabond. TLAV is a Value-For-Value experience. We want to invite you to subscribe to our Substack for as little as $5/month to join the discussion, comment on posts, join the TLAV Roundtable Discussions and feel good about supporting alternative media that you value. Upgrade to the Founding Member Level for the opportunity to have a monthly Q&A with Ryan as well. Thank you to all of you who already support TLAV in all the various ways that you do with your time, talent and treasure.
Share this post