Article by Scott Armstrong | Rebunked News | @RebunkedNews
Clip from The Daily Wrap-up with Ryan Cristián: New Ad5 Aerosolized COVID Jab Already Failure, Hotez/Fauci Funding & Was Patriot Front Just Exposed? (6/28/2023)
For more, please visit TheLastAmericanVagabond.com
Follow TLAV on Twitter: @TLAVagabond
New Studies, Same Story
We’re reaching a tipping point where more and more publications are coming out verifying what we already know, and have been able to prove, with various scientific papers going all the way back to the rollout of the COVID injections: the shots do not work and they are actually causing harm.
Two new studies came out in the last few months, one from just about two weeks ago, further clarifying this point. The first pre-print study entitled Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) among Those Up-to-Date and Not Up-to-Date on COVID-19 Vaccination published on June 12, 2023, demonstrates that people who were “not up-to-date” on their injections had a lower risk of contracting “COVID.”
According to the background of the paper:
Background The CDC recently defined being “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination as having received at least one dose of a COVID-19 bivalent vaccine. The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of COVID-19 among those “up-to-date” and “not up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination.
This retrospective cohort study, conducted through the Cleveland Clinic Health System, monitored over 40,000 eligible individuals and compared the number of cases of “COVID” between people who had received the new bivalent injection and people who had not received the new bivalent injection. It's worth noting here, according to the study, that only 27% of eligible people within that cohort were actually up-to-date and chose to receive the bivalent injection.
The study concludes:
In conclusion, this study found that not being “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination by the CDC definition was associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 than being “up-to-date”. This study highlights the challenges of counting on protection from a vaccine when the effectiveness of the vaccine decreases over time as new variants emerge that are antigenically very different from those used to develop the vaccine. It also demonstrates the folly of risk classification based solely on receipt of a vaccine of questionable effectiveness while ignoring protection provided by prior infection.
Also, in the discussion of the paper, the researchers make some bold statements that fly in the face of the establishment narrative:
This study’s findings question the wisdom of promoting the idea that every person needs to be “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination, as currently defined, at this time… it should be pointed out that there is not a single study that has shown that the COVID-19 bivalent vaccine protects against severe disease or death caused by the XBB lineages of the Omicron variant. At least one prior study has failed to find a protective effect of the bivalent vaccine against the XBB lineages of SARS-CoV-2. People may still choose to get the vaccine, but an assumption that the vaccine protects against severe disease and death is not reason enough to unconditionally push a vaccine of questionable effectiveness to all adults.
That “one prior study” mentioned above is another new study from April 2023 entitled Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine published in Oxford Academic, which very simply seeks to “evaluate whether a bivalent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine protects against COVID-19.”
This study was also conducted at The Cleveland Clinic and looked at 51,017 total individuals who had reported 4,424 cases of “COVID.” In looking at each of the “strains” known as BA.4/5, BQ, and the XBB strain, in effectiveness of the injection was averaged at 29%, 20% and 4% respectively.
The paper goes on to state:
The risk of COVID-19 also increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received.
And of course, we have to reference this study from all the way back in December 2021 entitled Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series: A Danish cohort study, which shows that after 95 days, the Pfizer and Moderna injections showed a -76.5% and -39.3% efficacy respectively.
Be sure to check out TLAV’s previous coverage of waning efficacy in a Substack post from December 2022:
Ignoring the Science
Who are the true science deniers here? Well it seems that Harvard and Johns Hopkins certainly haven’t gotten the memo. This is a list of schools, according to NoCollegeMandates.com, where the colleges that are still enforcing injection mandates are color-coded black:
It also appears that officials such as former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky (as seen in the video at the top of the page) knew that she was lying when she went on the record stating that at first they thought the injections were effective. That clip was from June 2023.
As we see here in this email, Walensky was expressing concern about “breakthrough” infections all the way back in January of 2021. By the way, she was getting her science from CNN:
And then there is this insane article from Newsbreak in Australia written just a few days ago still marching the narrative forward that yes, despite previous infection or any other thing you want to say, you still need to get the injection, no matter what, at all costs:
The article states:
Firstly, there is no such thing as “too much” immunity. Beyond the regular side-effects of a vaccine, there are no known additional risks to being re-vaccinated soon after an infection.
Absolutely insane.
So we have the proof that these shots don’t work, that they never worked, they are continuing to fail, that these government officials knew they were failing and that media outlets will break themselves just to keep that messaging going forward.
Please share this article far and wide to continue to break through the fog of deception that is continuing to block people from seeing the facts and is causing a lot of harm in the world.
Note to the Readers:
Thank you for your ongoing support of The Last American Vagabond. TLAV is a Value-For-Value experience. We want to invite you to subscribe to our Substack for as little as $5/month to join the discussion, comment on posts, join the TLAV Roundtable Discussions and feel good about supporting alternative media that you value. Upgrade to the Founding Member Level for the opportunity to have a monthly Q&A with Ryan as well. Thank you to all of you who already support TLAV in all the various ways that you do with your time, talent and treasure.
Two New Studies: More Shots Equals Higher Risk of "COVID" Infection