hi im not sure if this is Ryan writing this substack but im just curious what happened to Ryans critique of germ theory? 2 years ago you had Dr Kauffman on, you said you tilted toward his ideas on the fraud of virology. now i haven't heard you mention this in over a year (sorry if i missed something), and you never debunked/refuted what Kauffman had to say. plenty is going on with the virus debate including the settling the virus debate document ( https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/ ) and you have given zero coverage . whats the deal? question everything ?
Hey, this is Scott. Good points! I agree, it is definitely something very much worth debating further. I have done a lot of coverage on the topic. I feel very much in alignment with the fundamentals of Terrain Theory. In the show that I used to produce, Truthzilla, I had excellent conversations with Dr Tom Cowan, Alec Zeck and on my show Rebunked, in episode #26 I had a great talk with Dr. William Trebing, author of Goodbye Germ Theory. One of my favorite books. Must read! In my most recent episode with Corey Haag, we talked about microwave radiation warfare and the terrain theory discussion came up as well. Germ theory truly is the big domino that, if it were to fall, it would really destroy the entire big pharma medical cartel complex.
Hi Scott, that's great. I really enjoyed Truthzilla and wasn't aware of Rebunked. Just found now so will plow through some of your shows. Im glad we align to whatever degree, at least insofar as virology has plenty of work to do to get past the point of being pseudoscience, but Im more interested here in what happened to Ryan? There are curious things happening with the 'no virus' team in terms of opposition to their proposed 'settling the virus debate' experiment, namely the most vocal critics, much to their surprise, aren't virologists as one might expect, but those in the health freedom movement. Iv appreciated Ryan's work for a long time and try to give benefit of the doubt, but the response from the health freedom community to the very reasonable questions asked by Kauffman, Cowan etc. has definitely left me more cynical (didn't think that was possible), and I would love to know Ryan's response to what I raised in my first comment, as it appears from here to be an about face without explanation.
hi im not sure if this is Ryan writing this substack but im just curious what happened to Ryans critique of germ theory? 2 years ago you had Dr Kauffman on, you said you tilted toward his ideas on the fraud of virology. now i haven't heard you mention this in over a year (sorry if i missed something), and you never debunked/refuted what Kauffman had to say. plenty is going on with the virus debate including the settling the virus debate document ( https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/ ) and you have given zero coverage . whats the deal? question everything ?
Hey, this is Scott. Good points! I agree, it is definitely something very much worth debating further. I have done a lot of coverage on the topic. I feel very much in alignment with the fundamentals of Terrain Theory. In the show that I used to produce, Truthzilla, I had excellent conversations with Dr Tom Cowan, Alec Zeck and on my show Rebunked, in episode #26 I had a great talk with Dr. William Trebing, author of Goodbye Germ Theory. One of my favorite books. Must read! In my most recent episode with Corey Haag, we talked about microwave radiation warfare and the terrain theory discussion came up as well. Germ theory truly is the big domino that, if it were to fall, it would really destroy the entire big pharma medical cartel complex.
Hi Scott, that's great. I really enjoyed Truthzilla and wasn't aware of Rebunked. Just found now so will plow through some of your shows. Im glad we align to whatever degree, at least insofar as virology has plenty of work to do to get past the point of being pseudoscience, but Im more interested here in what happened to Ryan? There are curious things happening with the 'no virus' team in terms of opposition to their proposed 'settling the virus debate' experiment, namely the most vocal critics, much to their surprise, aren't virologists as one might expect, but those in the health freedom movement. Iv appreciated Ryan's work for a long time and try to give benefit of the doubt, but the response from the health freedom community to the very reasonable questions asked by Kauffman, Cowan etc. has definitely left me more cynical (didn't think that was possible), and I would love to know Ryan's response to what I raised in my first comment, as it appears from here to be an about face without explanation.
Cheers
Right on, thank you for the kind words. I will pass this along. Appreciate you!
Just FYI, it doesn't look like the archive.ph is correct. (It's just linking the home page.)
Great catch, thank you. Fixed. :)
Virology mimics medieval religion, doctrine built on superstition for the purpose of control.
Thanks for your support, keep up the amazing work too! We need every voice in this fight.