I'm very familiar with your work. That is why I don't get the point… Even if you're doing another article about Trump after, aren't you still emphasizing some sort of dichotomy by structuring your writings that way?
Something like the recent Larken Rose interview was great. Expending his many points into easily digestible concise articles would make a lot more sense to me than this strategy.
What is the point? Honest question here… I clearly don't get the point, because that seems like a counterproductive approach to me.
Why not cut to the chase and write an article about "Four reasons not to vote"? 🤔
So I guess you are unfamiliar with our work? There is a point to this series. We have done that, many, many times.
I'm very familiar with your work. That is why I don't get the point… Even if you're doing another article about Trump after, aren't you still emphasizing some sort of dichotomy by structuring your writings that way?
Something like the recent Larken Rose interview was great. Expending his many points into easily digestible concise articles would make a lot more sense to me than this strategy.
What is the point? Honest question here… I clearly don't get the point, because that seems like a counterproductive approach to me.
Maybe that will be part 3…