Only if you assume that A/i is completely independent, which it never will be. It will always be biased by its root programming even if it continues to expand on its own. It will be biased as the knowledge it has learned is also biased and seldom the pure, unadulterated truth.
A/i is crunching the truth, the lies, the propaganda and the biases. Adding a plus and three negatives = a negative. Therefore, A/i is a lie.
Thanks for this.
For the record, do you ever use generative A.I. for writing articles?
Only if you assume that A/i is completely independent, which it never will be. It will always be biased by its root programming even if it continues to expand on its own. It will be biased as the knowledge it has learned is also biased and seldom the pure, unadulterated truth.
A/i is crunching the truth, the lies, the propaganda and the biases. Adding a plus and three negatives = a negative. Therefore, A/i is a lie.
Good discussion. Ty
Thanks for delving into this topic.
My most recent post is a poll on "If you could train an "A.I." assistant/agent and autonomous robot to do all your work for you, would you?"
https://gavinmounsey.substack.com/p/poll-of-the-month-if-you-could-train
I offer some data on the downsides in the post.