3 Comments

It is insane. This situation we are in. These hormones es are very powerful. Testosterone is an em effer. I can safely say it has taken me a half century to somewhat tame this horse.

And what about the estrogen? Women have an even more difficult path when it comes to dealing with hormones. I think anyone would choose rape/kill over bawling all day long.

But we must balance. Discipline and activities towards knowledge stem these hormonal impulses, refine and evaluate them as we get a hold on life.

What is happening now is the opposite. A cruelty exists in giving these hormones to gender opposite people. It takes a lifetime to figure this out, to learn how to manage them.

This course is a recipe for disaster.

I have first hand experience with this. I was accosted by a T'd out person a few years ago. That is dangerous stuff. Best to learn it the old fashioned way.

Expand full comment

I really would love to hear what actual information Ryan is basing his skepticism about climate change on.

"I disagree... " based on what information?!

You can't disagree with something and know very little about it!

And anyone that does is obviously a fool!

Has Ryan bothered to do a deep dive into climate science? No?

Well then what in the hell is he basing his "disagreement" on?

Expand full comment

"Why would we accept half-truths... "

For as much as Ryan brings up climate change, it is still very perplexing that he seems to know so little about the subject.

He talks about it as if it's a matter of general pollution, but that isn't it... that isn't what physicists from 100 years ago were worried about.

It's the GREENHOUSE EFFECT that they were worried about.

As long as Ryan fails to be informed on the issue of carbon pollution he only sounds like a fool when he brings up climate change and adds the caveat, "I realize that we're wrecking the planet, but... "

No. You do not realize anything... because you do not know enough about the issue of carbon pollution to fully understand the issue of climate change, i.e. GLOBAL WARMING - it's not plastic or chemical or whatever pollution... it's CARBON POLLUTION.

I still cannot believe that so many people that follow the science on certain important issues instead follow the politics on climate change...

BEFORE there was a green tech industry Big Oil was spending millions to churn out junk science, and funding think tanks and bribing politicians to confuse the public - BEFORE the green tech industry emerged, BEFORE... and why did Big Oil do that?

Well, just like with Big Tobacco they knew that there was a problem with their products - a serious problem - a scientific problem related to the greenhouse effect and carbon pollution.

And so, WHY would people side with a big industry like Big Oil on one issue... but then realize that siding with a big industry like Big Pharma on another issue is untenable?

It seems like a serious inconsistency... but, that's what happens when politics is introduced.

Expand full comment