Article by Scott Armstrong | Rebunked News | @RebunkedNews
Clip from The Daily Wrap-Up with Ryan Cristián
The MRNA “Glitch”, The Murder Of Dr. Refaat Al-Areer, US Vetos Ceasefire & October 7 False Flag (12/8/2023)
For more, please visit TheLastAmericanVagabond.com
Follow TLAV on Twitter: @TLAVagabond
“Nonsense Proteins”
Last week, The Telegraph reported that MORE than 1 out of 4 people experienced an “unintended immune response” following the Pfizer COVID injection protocol. This is the link to the article on The Telegraph. You will see that it is behind a paywall, so here is the Archive.is link that will allow you to read and share the article without having to go behind the paywall.
The Archive.is link shows an archived version of the article from the original publication date, December 6, 2023, with the headline reading as follows:
This is what the article looks like right now on The Telegraph:
It is amusing that they removed the word “More” after it was published. This information strikes at the very heart of the COVID injection’s “safe and effective” narrative, so all efforts are being made to downplay the significance of this report.
The article starts by indicating that the injection caused an “unintended immune response created by a glitch in the way the vaccine was read by the body.” Well that is shocking.
The article goes on to say:
No adverse effects were created by the error, data show, but Cambridge scientists found such vaccines were not perfect and sometimes led to nonsense proteins being made instead of the desired Covid “spike”, which mimics infection and leads to antibody production.
Nonsense proteins??? That has to be one of the craziest things I have heard yet in this COVID saga. Dr. Simon Goddek summarizes my thoughts exactly:
Frameshifting
All of this information is in reference to a study published in Nature entitled “N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting” (funny enough, the study was not referenced anywhere in the Telegraph article, so I had to hunt it down myself). The paper asserts that a phenomenon known as “frameshifting” could occur, which may result in unintended immune responses. According to the conclusion of the paper:
We show that 1-methylΨ is a modified ribonucleotide that significantly increases +1 ribosomal frameshifting during mRNA translation and that cellular immunity to +1 frameshifted products can occur following vaccination with mRNA containing 1-methylΨ. To our knowledge, this is the first report that mRNA modification affects ribosomal frameshifting.
This is laid out in layman’s terms in the Telegraph article:
It was thought the minor tweak to uridine caused no problems in cells, but a team of researchers at the University of Cambridge’s Medical Research Council (MRC) Toxicology Unit have now found when this partially synthetic code is read, the protein-making machine in the body sometimes struggles with the uridine analogues.
Because it is not a perfect fit for what is expected, there can be a momentary pause which causes the process to stutter and a letter in the code can get skipped, much like a bike slipping a gear.
This process, called frameshifting, throws out the way the code is interpreted as it relies on groups of three bases, known as codons, being read in the right order.
This issue, caused by the jab’s code, throws the process completely out of sync and the entire subsequent code becomes garbled.
In the case of the Covid jabs, the end result is a nonsensical and harmless protein, the team found, which the body attacks and leads to an immune system flare-up. The new study, published in Nature, found this occurred in around 25-30 per cent of people.
The following Substack article by Igor Chudov does a good job of explaining what “Frameshifting” is and how it could be dangerous:
The Glitch That Won The Nobel Prize
The punchline of this entire story is that in 2023 Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the development of the synthetic uridine compound utilized in the COVID injections, and it’s now being attributed with causing over 25% of the people injected to suffer negative immune responses. According to Nature:
Their breakthrough discovery in 2005 showed that replacement of uridine with pseudouridine renders mRNA non-immunogenic. This paved the way for the development of mRNA-based vaccines at unprecedented speed, saving countless lives during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Still Trusting The Science?
The Last American Vagabond, along with many other independent media outlets, have been hammering the incredibly deceptive and scandalous COVID injection narrative from every angle as more and more information comes to light about the dangers and ineffectiveness of these shots. It is refreshing to see this information slowly starting to trickle its way into more “mainstream” sources.
The tide is shifting in the information battle and you can help by sharing this article far and wide.
Question everything!
Note to the Readers:
Thank you for your ongoing support of The Last American Vagabond. TLAV is a Value-For-Value experience. We want to invite you to subscribe to our Substack for as little as $5/month to join the discussion, comment on posts, join the TLAV Roundtable Discussions and feel good about supporting independent media that you value. Upgrade to the Founding Member Level for the opportunity to have a monthly Q&A with Ryan as well. Thank you to all of you who already support TLAV in all the various ways that you do with your time, talent and treasure.
25% Of People Who Received Covid Shot Had Negative Immune Responses